I tried enabling it out of curiosity, and I see that the code doesn't come close to compiling with it. Since it complains a lot about the various MSG(...) macros (warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99), I'm guessing that the answer will be yes.
I tried enabling it out of curiosity, and I see that the code doesn't come close to compiling with it.
Since it complains a lot about the various MSG(...) macros (warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99), I'm guessing that the answer will be yes.
To save any time spent discussing whether warnings with a rarely-used option can be ignored, I should mention that it also gave errors for, e.g., bitvec, apparently because a struct is returned. I can't imagine that we'd want to start changing around such things for the sake of this.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:18:05AM +0000, corvid wrote:
Since it complains a lot about the various MSG(...) macros (warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99),
I tried to get -pedantic to work and I could silence those warnings in the C source by specifying -std=gnu99 but I could find no gcc 3.4.x option to do the same for C++ source. Maybe gcc 4.x has one? Regards, Jeremy Henty
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:18:05AM +0000, corvid wrote:
I tried enabling it out of curiosity, and I see that the code doesn't come close to compiling with it.
Since it complains a lot about the various MSG(...) macros (warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99), I'm guessing that the answer will be yes.
Now that dillo needs a C++ compiler to build, I don't know whether this option is useful anymore. Does anybody know better? -- Cheers Jorge.-
participants (3)
-
corvid＠lavabit.com -
jcid＠dillo.org -
onepoint＠starurchin.org