Hi! I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? Sebastian
Hi all, On 13/04/16 21:29, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I have messed about a bit with hg, but getting nowhere. What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo build? Thanks, Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote:
Hi all,
On 13/04/16 21:29, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I have messed about a bit with hg, but getting nowhere.
What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo build?
you can get the dillo_grows branch with hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows Cheers, Johannes
On 14/04/16 19:22, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo build?
you can get the dillo_grows branch with
hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows
OK, thanks... but there is no ./configure file. Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On 14/04/16 19:35, Nick Warne wrote:
On 14/04/16 19:22, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo build?
you can get the dillo_grows branch with
hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows
OK, thanks... but there is no ./configure file.
Ignore this - me being an idiot. All is fine. Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I'm running it for some minutes now and it feels super fast! I'll report back after some more testing. Johannes
On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
I'm running it for some minutes now and it feels super fast!
Heh. Dillo on my lowly notebook is to fast - quicker than an eyeblick - how can it get faster? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I am sorry, this build is borken: http://forums.thinkbroadband.com There are lots of forums there - this build of Dillo only shows the first screen with no option to scroll down. Also I have found a few other issues. Nick
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev at dillo.org http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
-- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I am sorry, this build is borken:
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com
There are lots of forums there - this build of Dillo only shows the first screen with no option to scroll down.
Also I have found a few other issues.
I see the problem with forums.thinkbroadband.com, I'll look at it. However, the current version at hg.dillo.org shows the same problem, so this should not block the merge, only a release. Sebastian
On 14/04/16 21:05, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
I am sorry, this build is borken:
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com
There are lots of forums there - this build of Dillo only shows the first screen with no option to scroll down.
Also I have found a few other issues.
I see the problem with forums.thinkbroadband.com, I'll look at it.
However, the current version at hg.dillo.org shows the same problem, so this should not block the merge, only a release.
One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders correctly with: <div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: center;"> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' engine] </b></font> </span> </div> Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that passes through the text. To test: https://linicks.net/AnAdIc/ Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders correctly with:
<div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: center;"> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' engine] </b></font> </span> </div>
Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that passes through the text.
To test:
Again, this is again an issue also with the version at hg.dillo.org, although the result is slightly different.
Hi Sebastian, On 16/04/16 14:38, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders correctly with:
<div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: center;"> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' engine] </b></font> </span> </div>
Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that passes through the text.
To test:
Again, this is again an issue also with the version at hg.dillo.org, although the result is slightly different.
From what I see at a first glance the problem is that backgrounds for inline sections is not yet supported.
If noone reports severe problems with dillo_grows, which do *not* affect the version at hg.dillo.org, I'll do the merge soon.
Thanks for the hard work. I don't understand what you mean by that last sentence. If dillo_grows does have a few issues, then surely merging it with hg.dillo.org will taint that too? Or have I read it wrong? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Sa, Apr 16, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On 16/04/16 14:38, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders correctly with:
<div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: center;"> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' engine] </b></font> </span> </div>
Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that passes through the text.
To test:
Again, this is again an issue also with the version at hg.dillo.org, although the result is slightly different.
From what I see at a first glance the problem is that backgrounds for inline sections is not yet supported.
If noone reports severe problems with dillo_grows, which do *not* affect the version at hg.dillo.org, I'll do the merge soon.
Thanks for the hard work. I don't understand what you mean by that last sentence. If dillo_grows does have a few issues, then surely merging it with hg.dillo.org will taint that too? Or have I read it wrong?
Not if a bug is already in hg.dillo.org. Sebastian
Hi Nick, Thanks for your enthusiasm. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:07:06PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote:
On 16/04/16 14:38, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
[...] To test:
Again, this is again an issue also with the version at hg.dillo.org, although the result is slightly different.
From what I see at a first glance the problem is that backgrounds for inline sections is not yet supported.
If noone reports severe problems with dillo_grows, which do *not* affect the version at hg.dillo.org, I'll do the merge soon.
Thanks for the hard work. I don't understand what you mean by that last sentence. If dillo_grows does have a few issues, then surely merging it with hg.dillo.org will taint that too? Or have I read it wrong?
The point is a merge (moving the new rendering from grows to main). When this happens, a bug is _not_ regarded as a merge stopper when it also shows in the main repo (as the bug proves to be preexistent and not introduced by the new code). That's why core-devs are testing the branch as much as they can before giving the green light. Just checking no easily spottable bugs sneak into the main repo before the merge. Of course some bugs can make it into it undetected, but those, after the merge, are regarded as normal bugs thereon. -- Cheers Jorge.-
On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders correctly with:
<div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: center;"> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' engine] </b></font> </span> </div>
Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that passes through the text.
I looked at this in detail, and found some strange behaviour in all three versions of dillo (3.0.4, 3.1-dev, and 3.1-dev_grows2). Consider this HTML: <div> A <span style="background-color: green">B</span> C </div> <div> A <span style="background-color: green"><font>B</font></span> C </div> In the first line, "B" is shown with a green background, as expected, but not in the second line, where the only difference is the <font> element. Is this a bug of the HTML parser? Sebastian
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
I am sorry, this build is borken:
This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> <tr> <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint tradere et negent satis esse, quid bonum sit aut quid malum, sensu iudicari, sed animo etiam ac ratione intellegi posse et voluptatem ipsam per se esse expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse fugiendum. itaque aiunt hanc quasi naturalem atque insitam in animis nostris inesse notionem, ut alterum esse appetendum, alterum aspernandum sentiamus. Alii autem, quibus ego assentior, cum a philosophis compluribus permulta dicantur, cur nec voluptas in bonis sit numeranda nec in malis dolor, non existimant oportere nimium nos causae confidere, sed et argumentandum et accurate disserendum et rationibus conquisitis de voluptate et dolore disputandum putant.</td> </tr> </table> Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is correct. Sebastian
On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
I am sorry, this build is borken:
This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML:
<table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> <tr> <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint tradere et negent satis esse, quid bonum sit aut quid malum, sensu iudicari, sed animo etiam ac ratione intellegi posse et voluptatem ipsam per se esse expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse fugiendum. itaque aiunt hanc quasi naturalem atque insitam in animis nostris inesse notionem, ut alterum esse appetendum, alterum aspernandum sentiamus. Alii autem, quibus ego assentior, cum a philosophis compluribus permulta dicantur, cur nec voluptas in bonis sit numeranda nec in malis dolor, non existimant oportere nimium nos causae confidere, sed et argumentandum et accurate disserendum et rationibus conquisitis de voluptate et dolore disputandum putant.</td> </tr> </table>
Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is correct.
Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course). ? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On So, Apr 17, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
I am sorry, this build is borken:
This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML:
<table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> <tr> <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint [...] putant.</td> </tr> </table>
Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is correct.
Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course).
?
Simple answer: dillo 3.0.5 does not yet support CSS `height`. Sebastian
On So, Apr 17, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote:
I am sorry, this build is borken:
This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML:
<table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> <tr> <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint [...] putant.</td> </tr> </table>
Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is correct.
Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course).
?
The problem with versions 3.1-dev (at hg.dillo.org) and 3.1-dev_grows2. Dillo 3.0.5 has no problem, since CSS `heigh` was introduced in the 3.1-dev version (not yet released). Sebastian
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote:
Hi!
I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think?
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeey!!! Just started testing and got the feeling of our older dillo's speed again! It *feels* great! -- Cheers Jorge.-
participants (4)
-
jcid＠dillo.org -
Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de -
nick＠linicks.net -
sgeerken＠dillo.org