Indan Zupancic wrote:

Hello,

If it will stay a patch always, then you can remove it without problems. I think you should treat the code as if it is offical, so use only conditions where you would normally do, otherwise you may need to add them back later if it's merges with Dillo's code. So the question is, should Dillo have always tabs and/or frames support?

Point is, Sebastian (of Dw fame) has stated that he does not like the conditional compilation options as it complicates code maintenance (which is true). My standpoint was that not everyone liked or needed the extended functionality or (more importantly) could spare the memory for it. I have asked several times on the list whether these options should stay or go, but have not gotten a clear 'stay' response. So, I intend to remove the options since there does not seem to be a need for them. On tab/window preferences, there already is a preference to open new windows in tabs (tab_instead_of_window=YES). I will add an option to ignore the _blank target for those who do not like their browser to open new windows or tabs at random (check the archives for some examples of people complaining about this). Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank@unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]