patch: make prefs.c and dillorc2 consistent
The proposal here is to have everything commented out in the rc by default, and show what the default settings are so that people don't have to spend as much time experimenting when they want to configure their nifty superbrowser. When resolving inconsistencies, I generally picked the rc setting when uncommented, and the prefs one otherwise. Figured it would be a fair approximation of what Jorge might accept... Also, I remember Jorge once saying that maybe it should be named dillo2rc instead of dillorc2. I think so too.
Hi, On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:49:15AM +0000, corvid wrote:
The proposal here is to have everything commented out in the rc by default, and show what the default settings are so that people don't have to spend as much time experimenting when they want to configure their nifty superbrowser.
OK.
When resolving inconsistencies, I generally picked the rc setting when uncommented, and the prefs one otherwise. Figured it would be a fair approximation of what Jorge might accept...
Committed. I also set panel_size=large for function visibility and standard_widget_colors=NO (it looks nicer). BTW, my preference is allow_white_bg=NO, but left it as is (YES), waiting for your opinions.
Also, I remember Jorge once saying that maybe it should be named dillo2rc instead of dillorc2. I think so too.
Done. Please don't forget to rename your rc file: mv ~/.dillo/dillorc2 ~/.dillo/dillo2rc With regard to the menu bar, it was reimplemented using a more ortodox way (MenuBar instead of PopupMenu). It works and looks better now! -- Cheers Jorge.-
Jorge wrote:
BTW, my preference is allow_white_bg=NO, but left it as is (YES), waiting for your opinions.
I had set it to YES because it seemed less surprising for the people who aren't like me and don't page through dotfiles when trying software. (My aging screen is dimming and no longer capable of displaying a white background anyway.) In other news, I was just starting to play with the mangleme fuzzer that Justus mentioned some months back. It has quickly shown that something is wrong with html->Stash (e.g. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08204d28 ***), but I haven't looked into the problem yet.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:30:42PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Jorge wrote:
BTW, my preference is allow_white_bg=NO, but left it as is (YES), waiting for your opinions.
I had set it to YES because it seemed less surprising for the people who aren't like me and don't page through dotfiles when trying software.
Yes, that's why I also chose YES in the dillorc. Now, it would be funny if everybody changes it to NO. :-)
In other news, I was just starting to play with the mangleme fuzzer that Justus mentioned some months back. It has quickly shown that something is wrong with html->Stash (e.g. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08204d28 ***), but I haven't looked into the problem yet.
Oh, I missed that email. Where's the fuzzer? -- Cheers Jorge.-
Jorge wrote:
In other news, I was just starting to play with the mangleme fuzzer that Justus mentioned some months back.
Oh, I missed that email. Where's the fuzzer?
earlier thread: http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2008-May/004395.html fuzzer: http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/soft/mangleme.tgz
participants (2)
-
corvid＠lavabit.com -
jcid＠dillo.org