[Dillo-dev]about porting dillo to another toolkit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think dillo have to be ported to fox toolkit (http://fox-toolkit.org/) it is better than gtk2 and fltk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFARigvWVzJEsNrxK8RAnfXAKCJIYK8JBEpVmfn+GqhlzRqXVIq6gCfXLrw SuLflp2nwpqq2ctAytMVsuc= =mauP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
It is usually better to say why "fox toolkit (http://fox-toolkit.org/) it is better than gtk2 and fltk". Diego. El Wed, 03 Mar 2004 20:47:11 +0200 Eduard Bondarenko <edbond@zeos.net> escribio:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I think dillo have to be ported to fox toolkit (http://fox-toolkit.org/) it is better than gtk2 and fltk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFARigvWVzJEsNrxK8RAnfXAKCJIYK8JBEpVmfn+GqhlzRqXVIq6gCfXLrw SuLflp2nwpqq2ctAytMVsuc= =mauP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
participants (2)
-
Diego Sáenz -
Eduard Bondarenko