2 Jun
2008
2 Jun
'08
8:36 p.m.
Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
BTW, shouldn't we point users directly to fltk.org for downloading fltk2? Otherwise people might think that dillo2 needs a modified version of fltk2.
+1 . We shouldn't let anything discourage people from trying dillo2, so anything that suggests they might need to patch other software is a bad idea.
Along these lines, I've been wondering whether it might be a good idea to list the required and optional libraries on the CVS page.