Hi, I just profiled cvs- and 0.7.3 version. I used http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/ stored locally on disk (utilities.html rendered too fast here). I could not yet get any reproducible results from profiling, but cvs is obviously slower 5.1 vs. 3.9 seconds. And with cvs the GUI freezes until the whole page is loaded, whereas 0.7.3 displays the GUI while it is rendering the page (you can see the "Kb" counting in the upper right corner). Regards, Johannes Hofmann On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:09:26PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that utilities.html (from ImageMagick manual), takes near three times more time to render with CVS than with 0.7.3.
That page is 230KB and has no images. It takes 3 seconds to render with 0.7.3 vs 9 seconds of CVS (on a slow machine).
The same is true for the new and old parser.
Can somebody please profile it to find the overhead source? (./configure --enable-gprof).
TIA Jorge.-
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev