On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:18:06PM +0100, Hofmann Johannes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:07:36AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:23:22PM +0100, Hofmann Johannes wrote:
Hi,
if I'm interpreting http://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1808.txt correctly (check "5.1. Normal Examples"), dillo does not handle relative urls with queries correctly. In case of queries it truncates the filename. Anchors are handled correctly. You can see the difference here:
<a href="#foo">#foo</a> <a href="?foo=bar">?foo=bar</a>
Yes, dillo doesn't follow rfc1808.txt.
Dillo follows rfc2396 which updates rfc1808. This particular case was changed by it.
The nice thing about RFCs is that there is so many to choose from :)
Just found this here: http://www.communities.hp.com/securitysoftware/blogs/jeff/archive/2007/12/19... After reading it I would suggest to follow RFC 3986 which reintroduces the old (rfc1808) behaviour which is also consistent with e.g. firefox.
Given that info, it looks like RFC 3986 is the one to follow. I'll work on it. -- Cheers Jorge.-