On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:15:05PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Jorge wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:16:12AM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 06:04:15AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:25:47PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:35:28PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Would it be less trouble to have this widget as a child of the UI instead of in the rendering area? (I sort of had the impression that was the plan...
That's exactly the plan.
A simple fltk widget that hides/shows (as the findext bar) and that gives a text message. It should also support a fake HTML link (underlined word that reacts to left click).
Ah, I think I misunderstood the reference to "custom widget" in the TO DO note. I was fixated on the Dillo Widget system and didn't realise it was talking about a new FLTK widget. Maybe my patch isn't the way to go. Still, it would be nice for the custom widget to be properly CSS-styled. Maybe it be could another FltkViewport?
As this is part of the UI, I'd suggest to use Xdefaults as Johannes suggested for colors some time ago.
Ehmmm, by "Xdefaults", I mean the default X resource files.
ISTR that the latest was that Johannes was trying to get the FLTKers to enable the relevant code that had been commented out (rather than having dillo do it directly), but nothing happened on the fltk side.
FLTK2 is dead (that's almost official). Progress will happen in 1.3.x branch (or whatever they chose to call a new branch merging FLTK2 and 1.3.x [1]). In the meanwhile, I'd be OK with a non-themeable warning widget with the same colors it used to have. ;-) FWIW: the patch should implement an fltk widget as described in a previous email. So, no further work on the proposed patch is necessary. [1] http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?s7257+gfltk.development+v7263+T0 -- Cheers Jorge.-