Hmm, can you really fully test dillo in its build directory? You won't have the dpi stuff and loose functionality. Perhaps that should be noted too. With my recent patch (dpid-cleanup-and-DPIPATH.dillo2) one can use the attached script to run dillo in-tree which is nice if you just want to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Kemnade wrote: try it out but should also be useful for development purposes (easily manage different branches without the need to install them somewhere). One catch is the way dillo expects the dpis to be in their own directory the script solves that by creating a temporary directory, but this seems like a bad hack. What is the big idea behind this anyway? * dpis cant usually write to "their" own directory anyway * afaik this isn't a namespace thing either (since the directory is named like the executable without the .dpi extension) So unless there's a reason that I cannot see I would suggest to get rid of the X/X.dpi thing all together and stuff them all into one directory. Cheers, Justus - -- gpg key fingerprint: C82D 382A AB38 1A54 5290 19D6 A0F9 B035 686C 6996 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIKdUToPmwNWhsaZYRAqtyAJwNUOKoOPhKxJGAKKRBl68kIQ5PCQCgpV3D VFbjZobjZbmkSbEFa8lyNAY= =ro4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----