On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Jorge Arellano Cid<jcid@dillo.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:43:15PM -0700, Kelson Vibber wrote:
On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
I'd prefer to have both and to offer as an option from the download page (as with Fedora).
So just to confirm, two dillo packages per OS version / architecture combination, one compiled with SSL, one compiled without?
?That's the idea. Starting with the most used ones.
?WARNING: Please don't make the packages yet, I've got a last minute security vulnerability email, so maybe the tarball will change once more (the last). I'll try to have this solved tomorrow in the morning.
Okay, I'll wait until tomorrow before building anything else.
The good news is I finally got Fedora 10 i686 running from a USB key, and was able to build the current package!
So tomorrow I'll be able to build: Fedora 10 i686 and x86_64 RHEL 3 i386 RHEL 4 x86_64 RHEL 5 i686 and x86_64
?BTW, which is the easier way to install an rpm? Just download and "rpm -ivh <PKG>" or is there a ppa-like thing?
It's not that hard to create a repository with RPM packages but as I said it's generally bad thing to encourage users to use this as "repository", they would expect the same service like from general distribution distro (e.g. security fixes), which we don't wanna provide - because we believe Dillo2 in official distribution is The way. The `rpm -ivh <pkg>` is easy enough, I believe.
-- ?Cheers ?Jorge.-
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev