On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:17:54 -0800 Kelson Vibber <kelson@pobox.com> wrote:
The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more current code base.
-- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
BTW, how is this plan going? I mean, I like fltk, but on the site says (or said, I haven't seen it recently) that it will use 1.2.x version which is not supported any more by the fltk team (if I understood well). Which version is is is going to be used? I vote for 2.0 (Unicode by default is there). -- I haven't even got up and the bug is here :o)