On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:26:14AM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:52:07PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Yes, there is a case for keeping the flags for future development.
I'd prefer to keep the flags.
OK, I'll drop the patch and work on the rest.
Just so you know, the cleanups I have pending refactor a lot of code that calls the dList_* API in convoluted and inefficient ways. [...] [...] dList API was designed with a minimal working function set in mind. This keeps the API easy to remmeber and use.
I'm sure that's right but there's a lot of repeated code wherever dLists are cleaned up. That makes me think that the current API is a little *too* minimal.
Please try to get some performance numbers, and in the meanwhile send me a summary of the API changes.
I will. Regards, Jeremy Henty