On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:46:17PM -0700, sam+dillo@chaosring.org wrote: <snip>
As an aside, I think Dillo currently has excellent CSS support (namely, none whatsoever). The thinking behing CSS is that a webpage should be perfectly readable on a browser with no CSS support; the content (if not the presentation) of a CSS webpage is perfectly accessible from a non-CSS browser.
I come from the "CSS shouldn't be done at all, or should be done perfectly" camp. Considering the number of hacks web designers have come up to make CSS visible to this browser yet invisible to that browser [2], the last thing a webmaster wants is yet another buggy CSS implementation.
I couldn't agree more, and it's one of the reasons I use Dillo--to view pages according to their HTML structure. It's when you look at css-heavy pages that you appreciate webmasters that use the visibility feature of css to hide the navigation jumps to css-aware browsers; they become very user-friendly to non-css aware browsers. I suppose lynx would give the same effect :) Todd