On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 04:58:55PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:14:08PM +0100, Hofmann Johannes wrote:
Hi Jorge,
do you have an opinion on the (incompatible) changes to the font preferences as proposed in http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2009-January/005746.html
I'd like to commit this if you agree.
Oh yes, feel free to commit.
Committed.
Just let dillo-dev know how to upgrade our custom dillorc! :-)
At this point you're the most knowledgeable in font handling and CSS, thus some basic explanation of settings/usage would be welcomed too.
From the checking comment:
CSS 2.1 uses the following predefined font names: 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'cursive', 'fantasy', 'monospace'. Add preferences so that the user can set real font names for these. Basically the new "font_sans_serif" option is what "vw_fontame" used to be and "font_monospace" is equivalent to "fw_fontname". The other two options are new. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#generic-font-families has some more information including font examples. Cheers, Johannes