On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Madis Janson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, robert w hall wrote:
In article <20031016032905.GA12137@ws0.localdomain>, Stephen Lewis <slewis@paradise.net.nz> writes
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:20:11AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
This is also an RFC for information on GTK+2 (speed, size, linkings etc).
Please back your opinions with links, docs, facts or with whatever helps better to understand the point. Maybe a single email can show there's no way to do it, or maybe not!
I've just been playing with the GTK+2 patch, and I've got some numbers (I won't call them fact :), and opinions:
can we assume/hope/plead (in the light of these numbers!) that any move to gtk2 is post-dillo-0.8 :-)
Read dillo goals ;)
I believe that the move to gtk2 will be done only then, when it can be done without affecting dillo's usability as a light and fast browser.
Sure, dillo-0.8.0 will be a GTK1 app. BTW, I foresee almost a month to its release: we still have to sabilize dpi, and study/merge/modify some/all of Frank's patches. Last but not the least, please continue posting on the FLTK thread. It's the same! Cheers Jorge.-