Diego wrote:
Hello and happy new year. I want to suggest something for fltk 1.3 port.
First. I think that to name dillo 1.3 vs dillo 2.0 is confusing. Dillo was 2.0 for a lot of changes (css, etc) one of them fltk port.
We don't plan to decrease dillo's version number. Sorry for the confusion there.
Second. I want to suggest to not to remove the fltk 2.0 support code from dillo.
DilloWidget support more than one "backend" so fltk 1.3 can be added whitout remove fltk 2.0 and selected at compile time or even runtime. Using 1.3 and compile time as sane defaults, of course.
A test version that draw 2 windows aech one with a "backend" can ve used to compare visual results during the port to 1.3.
To support 2 "backend" now can heltp to support others in the future. ?what about a directfb one? Debian instaler will thanks it even i them use X now.
Given the amount of fltk2 code in src/ now, I have to wonder how well we could support multiple toolkits even in the case when they are all healthy and active...