Hi all,
P.S. Are we going to call Dillo with FLTK1.3 as Dillo3? One problem is that on the surface nothing has changed from Dillo2, so users will probably get confused. Probably...
Guys, how about putting some images from current Dillo with FLTK1.3 into another table at //www.dillo.org/screenshots/? Once there is no definition about release name, the table title can be something like "Dillo with FLTK1.3", plus (maybe) something catchy as "Coming Soon". My point is, you are all doing a lot of job around FLTK1.3 (Yeah!) and a page update might attract more attention to the project, also helping it to get pushed into distros again :) Best regards, F?bio ps: Great work, folks! 2011/6/9 Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:16:58PM -0700, Globe Trotter wrote:
Do we have features/bugs for each milestone documented anywhere? http://www.dillo.org/Plans.html is a bit too high level.
That's the place we have. We can't do much better without more manpower. BTW, I'm surprised on how accurate it became.
What comes after 1.3?
Floating objects! And maybe some announcements that may surprise our users.
The point of fltk-1.3 for the Dillo project is to be back in the distro's repos. This is paramount to us.
I doubt fltk 1.3 will be released on Wednesday: they have yet to release their RC7 which was supposed to be June 1,
It's hard to know when it'll happen. After +5years waiting for fltk2, I can only hope fltk-1.3 is released soon. FWIW, development in this branch is very active so it looks like it could happen soon.
IIRC, the first estimated release dates were for December 2010.
P.S. Are we going to call Dillo with FLTK1.3 as Dillo3? One problem is that on the surface nothing has changed from Dillo2, so users will probably get confused.
Probably...
And possibly the next fltk release will be fltk-3.0, and we should be able to link against it.
Btw, it is unfathomable to me why weekly fltk2 updates continue to be released......
C'mon, that's an easy one!
hopefully, fltk1.3 will not be as much of a roadblock in terms of facilitating adoption of dillo as fltk2 was. Recall that since they never hit stable, distros such as Fedora did not go for dillo2 (sticking with dillo 0.8.6).
That's the sad part of the story.
-- Cheers Jorge.-
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@dillo.org http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev