21 Dec
2004
21 Dec
'04
1:44 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:35:33AM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:10:50PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
Is there still a good reason to set umask to 0 for all plugins?
... it makes much more sense to use 077 as a mask for dpis (i.e. only allowing the owner).
Comments are welcome.
Well, I'd vote for 077. World-writable files give me the willies.
Just changed dpid's umask to 0077. As Dillo is not designed to share its internal files among users, this seems to be the right setting. Does anyone know better about umask's effects in depth? -- Cheers Jorge.-