On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:43:03AM -0700, TBlittlefoot wrote:
Now would you tell me what good black on black or white on white is?
I quite often see web sites that render black on black in dillo. I assume they use some standard trick that dillo doesn't support. I just switch to links to read such sites, and if that doesn't work I give up. I've never found such a site that I cared enough about to bother working out exactly what is going on. So I can't help much more I'm afraid.
Sure. That's what I've been doing, and it isn't a problem. I just wondered if there was some configuration choice that would easily fix the 'problem'. It sure isn't something the authors should waste any time with, in my estimation. While we're chatting, Jeremy, just why is dillo as large as it is? (I realize that it is less than 1/10 the size of most browsers) I have 1.3M for the executable here. What is it about the current state of the Web (HTML and/or servers) that necessitates this size? W3m is only .7K and does a great job as a textmode browser. Why so much more just to display static images? Big thanks to Jorge and the gang. Great browser. Tom