On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 19:03:42 +0100 Nick Warne <nick at linicks.net> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 16:37:56 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote:
Jorge wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:10:54AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:48:28PM +0000, eocene wrote:
I wanted to see what it would take to use mbed tls with dillo.
I put a copy of the diff at http://www.dillo.org/test/mbedtls.diff and I mention it here in case someone should want that one day.
Excellent. I like mbedtls (formerly known as PolarSSL). The code looks much saner to me than openssl.
If you both agree it's a better lib than OpenSSL, +1.
All right, then. *commits*
If you need mbed TLS 2.x: https://tls.mbed.org/download
Ha ha.... that got me. I updated Dillo, and found SSL sites don't work. So I clicked on the above link... doesn't work as it is SSL :)
OK, what do I need to do to build this after an hour of head scratching: checking mbedtls/ssl.h usability... no checking mbedtls/ssl.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: mbedtls/ssl.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: mbedtls/ssl.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: mbedtls/ssl.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: mbedtls/ssl.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: mbedtls/ssl.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for mbedtls/ssl.h... no configure: WARNING: *** mbed TLS 2 not found. Disabling SSL/HTTPS/TLS support. *** Thanks, Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"