robert w hall wrote:
In message <7ff5668305012822047c7c59a5@mail.gmail.com>, Kelly Price <strredwolf@gmail.com> writes
Heya. New here. Glad someone's working on Dillo. Hope it comes full-featured like Firefox is with less than half the bloat!
well some of us want NO bloat, and would err on the side of something less than fully-featured to ensure that.
If others really require a firefox-competitor, perhaps we are heading for a dillo-lite...
Robert you have some problems but because I'm here as software developer and not as puppy mainteiner I will avoid to explain you why you missed THE point of that mail. But you still missed! ;-) However if some patches doesn't meet the strict requirements of the core dillo developers team doesn't mean that patches are crap or useless to others people. I still remember you that free software is for free people who have the right of choice and not to be forced to use 'dillo' as you imagined. Because you could be a genius but your imagination, by definition of genius as human being element, is still limitated. Because there are some patches out of there AT LEAST could be interesting for dillo users and for the project itself have a page collecting all these contribute AS patches. "AT LEAST for project itself too" exactly means "to reduce the risk of a fork". Which it could be not so difficult as you think, that could be less difficult than still sticky to YOUR limnitated-imagination-dillo. :-) Cheers, -- Roberto A. Foglietta Analista Programmatore GNU/Linux SAD Trasporto Locale S.p.a. Corso Italia 13/N 39100 BOLZANO (I) Tel. +39/0471-450.261 Fax +39/0471-450.253