16 May
2008
16 May
'08
10:50 p.m.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:21:25PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Are "dillo1" and "dillo2" official names? If so, I'll add in some text to make it clear what's what.
They're not official, but good mnemonics! When there was GTK1 dillo only, there was no confusion. Currently the CVS is using dillo-fltk, but I'd much prefer to have a binary named "dillo2". Probably this is a good choice. Let's hear what dillo-dev people say. Here's the proposal: * call the new binary "dillo2", and refer to the old 0.8.x series as dillo1. -- Cheers Jorge.-