24 Sep
2008
24 Sep
'08
1:16 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
* Jeremy Henty <onepoint@starurchin.org> [080923 15:57]:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:52:07AM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
The dw package is an awkward case. I think we should bite the bullet and either move it inside dillo2 or make it an independent package that the user installs and have dillo2 find and use the installed dw (and lose the dw-testbed symbolic link).
Sorry for this interruption but what is the reason dw exists? I never understood that.
Dw2 can also be used for other projects. Sometime ago, having independent trees allowed Sebastian and me to work comfortably. but now, AFAIS, dw2 fits better inside dillo2's tree. -- Cheers Jorge.-