8 Oct
2008
8 Oct
'08
1:12 p.m.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:13:23AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Of course, dillo2 is not a library package, but I think it should follow the same convention on the grounds of least surprise. (Unless there is a compelling reason not to, but I don't think that there is.)
Does dillo1 offer *anything* over dillo2? E.g. why would you want dillo1 and dillo2 at the same time. If there is no such reason, it doesn't make sense to rename the binary. Joerg