6 Sep
2005
6 Sep
'05
9:36 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 04:53:27AM -0700, TBlittlefoot wrote: <snip>
While we're chatting, Jeremy, just why is dillo as large as it is? (I realize that it is less than 1/10 the size of most browsers) I have 1.3M for the executable here.
What is it about the current state of the Web (HTML and/or servers) that necessitates this size?
W3m is only .7K and does a great job as a textmode browser. Why so much more just to display static images?
Correction. That's .7M. It is actually bigger than Dillo stripped! Tom