Hi Melvin, I just checked the two binaries (0.7 and 0.7.2.1) and it seems that 0.7.2.1 is linking a few libraries in statically. It didn't occur to me to check ldd on both binaries. Thanks for the hint. SD --- Melvin Hadasht <melvin.hadasht@free.fr> wrote:
Hi Simon,
on Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:02:58 -0800 (PST) Simon Davis <sd1324@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
After building dillo 0.7.1.2 and stripping the binary the file size is almost 1.6 megs. When I built 0.7 the final binary came out to be 289k.
I built both using the uclibc library and gcc 3.2.
Is there some special configuration option I need to add to make the binary smaller?
Maybe it was not dynamically linked? Try "ldd `which dillo`", it will show you to which library it is dynamically linked.
Cheers
-- Melvin Hadasht
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com