Why don't we have a branch more like the Linux kernel?
I would _love_ to have a cvs branch that had every bit of developmental code in it so that we can see what's happening:
To be honest, I would prefer not to use CVS at all, but instead just have a list of patches in unified diff format on the Dillo website, with a note saying which version they were made against. That way, everybody can apply whatever combination of patches they want to quickly and easily, and you can unapply a patch just using -R. Unified diff format makes it easier to apply patches against code that has already been modified.
Even though it will be _very_ unstable. My theory is, if it is good enough for a screenshot, it's good enough for the 'developmental' branch.
This would also mean that the developer's personal trees will be better sync'ed
Having a separate development branch does create a fair amount of work, keeping the two in sync. John.