On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:59:34PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
000:<:c47f: 40: RENDERRequest(154): RenderCompositeGlyphs8 op=Over(0x03) src=0x01c0000f dst=0x01c00036 maskFormat=0x00000026 glyphset=0x01c00037 xSrc=0 ySrc=0 glyphcmds={deltax=5 deltay=554 glyphs=0x5a,0x4b,0x48,0x51; };
Hi Johannes, two additonal observation: 1) I've had a look at the xtrace output of dillo1. It seems not to use the RENDER extension (apart from two requests 000:<:0029: 12: RENDERRequest(151): RenderQueryVersion majorVersion=0 minorVersion=10 000:<:002a: 4: RENDERRequest(151): RenderQueryPictFormats at the beginning). 2) I've played around with 2D-acceleration and compared CPU load while scrolling. Result: dillo1: XAA: excellent (almost no load), EXA: very bad (100%, delays) dillo2: XAA: bad (100%) EXA: slightly better (75%) I've read that the EXA implementation of my Xorg server (7.1.1) is very bad, at least for my video driver (savage). On the other hand, RENDER support is said to be better in EXA than in XAA. So could it be that it has to do with RENDER and that most of you have decent hadware acceleration for that? Cheers, -- Matthias Franz