On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 07:45:09PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:35:09PM +0200, August Karlstrom wrote:
[...]
FWIW, IMHO, it should scale respecting the original image ratio (just pragmatics).
AFAIR, it was/could-be done this way by dillo (using CSS hints) but somewhere in the redesign (GROWS) these image-size hints were lost. @Sebastian, @Johannes, please correct me if I'm wrong here.
as it was mentioned in this thread already the image scaling issue is fixed for quite some time in the main line of the dillo repo.
Yes, but it still has some problems, as shown in August's example. I usually find image-scaling issues while surfing, so I *knew* there was something there, but never found the time to dig it. Today I made a test page (by no means complete yet), and it shows there are plenty of things right, and some others ignored (attached). The good news is that it seems the mechanisms for solving scaling are still there, and that the main issue comes with percentages. As August's example tests percentages in old style HTML (not CSS), I tested mingling a bit of CSS. If Sebastian confirms me there's not someting fundamentally lacking within percentage scaling, I could work on this issue trying to nail the bizantine plethora of possible combinations. :-P FWIW, in the test-page comments, FF means Firefox. -- Cheers Jorge.-