On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 02:47:22AM +0200, Victor Sahlstedt wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:48:04 +0200 Frank de Lange <frank@unternet.org> wrote:
The next version (10) of my tab patch is ready
salan@smedjan:~/incoming/cvs/dillo> gmake -s Making all in doc Making all in src Making all in IO http.c: In function `Http_use_socket': http.c:228: structure has no member named `bw' http.c:232: structure has no member named `bw' http.c: In function `Http_connect_socket': http.c:320: structure has no member named `bw' http.c: In function `Http_send_query': http.c:339: structure has no member named `bw' http.c: In function `Http_get': http.c:406: structure has no member named `bw' http.c: In function `a_Http_ccc': http.c:437: structure has no member named `bw' http.c:466: structure has no member named `bw' http.c:477: structure has no member named `bw' http.c:502: structure has no member named `bw' gmake[3]: *** [http.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake: *** [all] Error 2
dillo-20030821-tabs.patch.gz patched against 08/21 CVS. It's related to the patch as Dillo compiles fine without it.
OpenBSD 3.3 / GCC 2.95.3
- Victor
Hm, sounds like BW_MSG is not patched correctly in your case, did the patch not apply cleanly? Which patch are you actually using, and which CVS version? Patch 10 (the one I just released) is against 09/26 CVS (not 08/21 like you state in your message), and the patch file is dillo-20030926-tabs.patch.gz (not dillo-20030821-tabs.patch.gz). Try again with the correct versions, and if it does not work, by all means let me know... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +46-734352015 / \ frank@unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]