* Frank de Lange <frank@unternet.org> [09-25-03 16:14]:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:17:12PM +0200, Andreas Schweitzer wrote:
I'm guessing almost everybody wants to have frames, so maybe removing the conditional compilation of frames is worthwhile for the sake of simplifying code.
Not only everybody *wants* it. Afterall, frames are part of the HTML standard. So it makes sense to have them.
But then again, as far as I understood some of the last e-mails from Jorge : isn't he reviewing this patch now or pretty soon ?
It was in reaction to comments from Sebastian that I posed this question to the list. He suggested removing the conditional compile, but I want to know what the list has to say on this. As a quick look at the list archives will show, not everyone likes these new additions to Dillo.
The _tabbed_ browsing is wonderful and, afaiac, necessary, along with the tab_on_middle_click.
- exchange tab_load_in_background with a UI element/choice (I think this should be delayed until Dillo has a preference UI/plugin to avoid unnecessary complexity and one-off solutions)
acceptable
I will release a new version today or tomorrow
Looking forward. Will provide a SuSE 8.1 rpm if I am able to compile. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org