On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:22:43 -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org> wrote:
The dpi framework works with isolated processes. A third option could be to make an alternative implementation that works in Win. For instance, is there a dbus port running in Win*?
There is, although I have a couple reservations. I'm not sure how cleanly it could be packaged, or whether it would run on Windows 9x (one of my goals is to support all the way back to Windows 95). I also have some personal dislike for it, after dealing with much dbus-related breakage in my Linux development days. I do appreciate the suggestion, though, and if you think it could work, I will certainly look into it. On a related note, is there any reason not to cut DPI out of the download system, i.e. just invoke a separate downloader process directly? I'm considering implementing that at least as a temporary solution, using my own self-contained download tool. Or is something more passed through than just a URL? Thanks again, ~Benjamin