On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:58:20PM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
Hi Brian,
Sorry for the delayed answer, I had a lot of work with the release and now I'm trying to catch up.
not a problem.
Cookies will most probably end being a dpi server (to solve the problem of enabling cookies in multiple Dillo instances). This was planned long ago and hasn't been realized because of lack of manpower (aka priorities :-).
ok.
The configuration data problem (cacherc, cookiesrc, dillorc, <dpi-name>rc) is also a general issue that we're considering with Sebastian. Maybe it will all end in a generic preferences dpi; this needs some further thought.
ok, in that case, i'm going to leave things as they are the way i did them for now, when it is decided how configuration will be handled, i'd be more than happy to work on that to get it done.
Soon a prioritized task list will be available in dillo-dev (I just sent back a good draft to Seb.). This account for what we, the core developers, will be doing the next months.
ok, i can't wait!!
The good news is that tasks that get lower priorities can be advanced by the interested volunteers.
you can count me in on this as well.
Please stay tuned, we're trying to cope with all the work we have, by organizing the work. The cache issues intersect with SSL (needs cache control), preferences handling, cookies dpi server, and the universal CCC branch idea). When the commented task list is posted, you'll get the idea.
ok, at that point we can start discussing how things will be done as relates to what i've been working on. i'll wait till then! -brian -- IHTFP: I firmly believe that people dumber than me exist solely for my amusement. IHTFP: Okay, maybe not solely for my amusement. Some of them make good cake.