In article <DC4D721BDF5B754A8228EC6A184E746F8235C5@sj-exstore.wyse.com>, Linda J. Laubenheimer <llaubenheimer@wyse.com> writes
-----Original Message----- From: dillo-dev-admin@lists.auriga.wearlab.de [mailto:dillo-dev-admin@lists.auriga.wearlab.de] On Behalf Of Sebastian Geerken Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:58 AM To: dillo-dev@lists.auriga.wearlab.de Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]which version does this patch file patch *Headdesk* So that's why it won't compile with glib2 and gtk2. It always ended up linking against libmodule 1.2, libglib 1.2, etc., if it compiled at all, because gtk+ apparently links against those, regardless of what you tell it in gtk-config.
Oh, well, no Dillo on my thin box. If you have to install two versions of a library, you've done something wrong. The other stuff on the box wants the later libraries (glib2, gtk2). I'm not a C programmer, otherwise I'd fix it and send it to you.
ljl
It might be worthwhile your looking back on the lists for why gtk-2 wasn't pursued - my recollection was that the initial binaries were both reported to be larger and very significantly slower. Many of us run dillo on systems with significant memory and cpu constraints (eg in my case playstation2 or old dx4-100 laptops), constraints you will be familiar with (thinks, perhaps you should _downsize to gtk1.2 :-))) Bob -- robert w hall