I would consider trying to do a gtk2 port, or is this discouraged ? The reason is that gtk2 seem's to be the most used toolkit these days, also it's available using cairo for rendering :-) .. ( hardware acceleration, glitz ). I have to give it a good thinkover berore I commit to it though. / Lars Segerlund. On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:32:32 -0400 Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid@dillo.org> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Matthias Franz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Florent BERANGER wrote:
see the http://fr.wikipedia.org web page for exemple.
This page is encoded in UTF-8.
See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html for more on UTF-8.
It would certainly be nice if Dillo accepted UTF-8 encoding of ISO-8859-1, but at present this is not the case.
Matthias is right.
Our idea is to switch Dillo to FLTK and then to handle strings in UTF8, the other encodings can be converted to it.
FLTK is not as far as it seems. After dillo-0.8.3 is released, Sebastian will merge the new Dw abstraction layer. We also have a testbed to test Dw over another widget set (in this case FLTK). Once the Dw testbed works over FLTK, the next step is to do the same with the Dw inside Dillo, and finally to port Dillo's GUI to FLTK (a simple task because our GUI is no rocket science).
Manpower is highly appreciated.
-- Cheers Jorge.-
_______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev@lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev