Paul Pelzl wrote:
I wouldn't mind setting up a patches list, but only if there is demand for it. Is patch discussion creating too much traffic on the wearlab mailing list? If not, then it seems like keeping patch discussion on the list would give the patches more exposure.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Paul
I think that patch traffic belongs on this list, as it is quite often relevant for all of Dillo (patched or unpatched). It also keeps the patches in sight for users/developers of unpatched Dillo, which should generate exposure. If/when the patches really take on a life of theirselves it is time to move, but that time has not arrived as far as I'm concerned. Good initiative btw, the Archive. Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank@unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]