Oct. 2, 2004
12:03 a.m.
What's bad about that code? HTML 4 is, in the absence of headers or meta tags indicating otherwise, assumed to be ISO-8859-1. The é is perfectly legal there.
If you give Dillo an ISO-8859-1 'é', it will work fine.
Now, if you give it in some other encoding, it will fail.
Given that they show up correctly when I look at that site here, I suspect it's a font problem on the display, not an HTML or Dillo problem.
Yes, it could be. BTW, if the source page has an ISO-8859-1 'é' this is surely the problem.
Sorry, I should have said: "if the source page has a NON ISO-8859-1 'é', this is surely the problem" -- Cheers Jorge.-