On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:13:59 -0400 Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid at dillo.org> wrote:
OK, let's take a look at this one.
The idea is to inform that the bug meter detected zero HTML errors, not that the doc is perfect (because the bug meter checks a subset of the syntax/grammar legalese).
How is that best expressed in english?
- a_Dialog_msg("Dillo: Valid HTML!", "Zero detected HTML errors!"); + a_Dialog_msg("Dillo: Valid HTML!", "Detected no HTML errors!");
Well, lets suppose that someone is called 'Zero'. "Zero detected HTML errors!" implies that he/she detected errors! What about: "Could not detect any HTML errors!" which then implies that the current bug meter thinks it's OK (but as we know, there _still_ may be HTML errors. Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"