Jorge wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:05:07PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Jorge wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:01:12PM +0300, Tomas Rimkus wrote:
Accidentally sent to corvid only. Forwarding to dillo-dev.
> It seems whoever designed the new website theme has no idea what > READABILITY means... It looks like someone just used some stupid online > color picker, which just picks some similar colors to the one user > chooses. The old website looked MUCH MUCH better. Imho, it's a > regression...
Hm I like the new design, but I agree that readability might be a problem. Let's see what other say.
I still find visited text to be hard to read, but I know I should break down and get a new display...
I wonder if you are the only dillo user with old display... BTW, I am using pretty new LCD display and still find it hard to read.
OK, we also had readability concerns but we agreed that it was enough. OTOH some people bashed the old design as prehistoric!
After all it's a matter of taste. Usability is a different thing. Maybe you need higher contrast to see clearly (I suffer with white backgrounds). Do you find this one better to read [1]?
What do other people think about the new web design? Aesthetically and from a readability point of view. Please comment.
The test page's visited text is easier for me to read than the home page's visited text.
Funny how it's the reverse effect for me! :-)
Please test:
:visited {color: #403090 !important}
and
:visited {color: #603060 !important}
on http://www.dillo.org/ and FAQ.
I prefer the first one because it fits the palette better.
First one is easier.