On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:21:47PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Am I the only one getting very poor performance from FreeHG ? Quite often I get a 404 Not Found and right now it's hanging. Everyone confirms that Mercurial itself is really fast and I've seen other reports criticising FreeHG's performance. Perhaps we should think about moving host? It's not always easy to find time to devote to Dillo so it's rather aggravating when that time is wasted just waiting for a connection to the server. I'm committed enough to grit my teeth and wait but I can see it putting off would-be contributors.
Just a thought,
Yes, I've also had trouble with it, and when normal it's slower than our Wearlab's CVS. A couple of days ago (while developoing/reviewing patches) I digged a bit on it and it seems that bitbucket is much faster. We can try bitbucket while we find a long term solution (e.g. FSF's savannah is offering Mercurial and Git repos, but the applying process may take some time). At some point in time we should move out from the Wearlab, as it may be closed soon. Currently we need webserver/CGI/python shell accounts and a DCVS (Hg or Git). CGI is quite useful, but we may use another bugtracker too. Suggestions? -- Cheers Jorge.- ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________