Replying to myself *again*, this is getting to be a bad habit! :-) On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:57:48PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 07:04:05PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
Cool! But perhaps it should even be "Dillo" instead of "Dillo2". It's still dillo after all.
I thought about that, then I decided that since we now use dillo2rc I would go with dillo2 for consistency.
After more thought I now agree with Johannes. WM_CLASS should tell the desktop whether the window is running Dillo, Firefox, XChat, GnuCash, GIMP or whatever. It should not make the user worry whether they're running dillo1 or dillo2. That's precisely the kind of detail that the desktop should be hiding from the user. So WM_CLASS should be just "Dillo", whatever the dillo executable is called. Regards, Jeremy Henty