7 Jan
2011
7 Jan
'11
3 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 01:29:46PM +0000, corvid wrote:
Johannes wrote:
I would go with a separate repo for fltk-1.3 development. It's still a branch, so we can use 3-way merging to keep things in sync with mainline. The only difference is that you don't get fltk-1.3 development stuff automatically when cloning the main repo - which I think is a good thing. Once it's ready we pull it over in the main repo. That's the same procedure we used for the CSS-experimental branch.
Andreas added a repository for me.
I've done most of the really mindless parts now, so now we merely need to do all of the hard parts!
Great. I hope we don't hit any showstoppers...