On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 09:38:11 +0100 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann@gmx.de> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 04:40:01PM -0500, me at swva wrote:
I think I'm being unclear, in two ways.
Just to check, I did this as root :
[root@Hbsk2 btth]# rpm -q dillo dillo-0.8.6-7.fc9.i386 [root@Hbsk2 btth]# yum update dillo ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit updates-newkey | 2.3 kB 00:00 updates | 2.6 kB 00:00 fedora | 2.4 kB 00:00 Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [root@Hbsk2 btth]#
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Johannes Hofmann wrote:
dillo-0.8.6 is no longer supported and you should consider to upgrade to dillo-2.0. But nevertheless for me it also works with dillo-0.8.6.
For those who run other OSs, what the emphasized lines mean is the 0.8.6 is what Fedora has, period. (I run F9, the latest release.) Any idea why it's so far behind?? I didn't realize 1.0 had become official, let alone 2.0
If you enter "google.com" in the location bar and hit return it doesn't go to google?
It does indeed. I'm putting this badly.
I run Alpine 2.0; it is set to launch the default browser, which is dillo -- and URLs in emails are what I use a default browser for.
Does this mean something in my Alpine settings (and my Pine 4.64 settings, which it took over) is wrong? My Fedora default browser setting is simply "dillo %s"; my Alpine setting is something I'll have to dig for, as it's buried way deep.
I don't know what Alpine exactly does, but if I do dillo google.com on the command line, it works fine with both dillo 2.0 and 0.8.6.
The interesting question here is which 0.8.6? the official one or the inofficial dillo-i18n one? At least debian does not ship the official one. If that's about the dillo-i18n stuff (and not reproducable with official dillo), then the problem should go to the corresponding team. Greetings Andreas Kemnade