On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:26:10PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 06:49:39PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:13:13PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote:
I'd say go with table... ...and that's it.
:-( I was looking forward to more slicing and dicing! ;-)
You can keep on polishing!
Actually, I think I've done most of the easy polishing for the moment. I might actually have to fix something! :-)
It's just we _may_ need to change some of the parser structure in the future and I didn't want you to polish it throughly and then see it re-structured into something different.
Fair enough. What was the decision about splitting off table.cc ? I sent in the patch but it hasn't appeared in CVS and I've not seen a response. I don't particularly mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether it's going to happen. Regards, Jeremy Henty