20 Jan
2010
20 Jan
'10
2:09 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:52:31AM +0000, corvid wrote:
A few hours ago, I started to wonder how much trouble it would be to make https.c understand gnutls instead of openssl.
The answer is: If you borrow liberally from the public domain code in the gnutls manual, then not very much!
So here's a toy for anyone who would like one: http://www.dillo.org/test/gnutls.0.patch
Quite interesting. AFAIS from the patch it's doing more or less the same as the current https dpi. It looks like this dpi's certificate handling code may be easier to complete with GNU TLS. What's the motivation for the switch? -- Cheers Jorge.-