24 Mar
2009
24 Mar
'09
5:48 a.m.
* corvid <corvid@lavabit.com> wrote:
Oh, also, did 2.0 work for you?
Yes. But how about something more specific... I ran 'hg bisect' on it and here is the result: The first bad revision is: changeset: 491:96a14e974cfb tag: 2.1-noCss user: corvid <corvid@lavabit.com> date: Thu Jan 15 18:33:04 2009 -0300 summary: Added the "http_language" dillorc option for setting HTTP's Accept-Language. The diff for that revision doesn't really tell me why it broke then... nothing obvious stands out. But r490 works and r491 doesn't. Maybe you'll see something I don't. :) -- Scott