[Dillo-dev] include guard naming

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:09:53PM -0400, corvid@lavabit.com wrote:

I was just going through and changing the include guards that don't follow the dillo convention, and then I glanced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Include_guard and it reminds me that the C++ standard prohibits '_'s at the beginning.

Does anyone care enough to have an opinion? If we want to rm the leading or surrounding underscores, I might as well do that too before committing.

A "D_" prefix looks OK to me. e.g. #ifndef D_BINARYCONST_H #define D_BINARYCONST_H ... #endif /* D_BINARYCONST_H */ -- Cheers Jorge.-