12 May
2008
12 May
'08
9 p.m.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:08:38PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
Hmm, can you really fully test dillo in its build directory? You won't have the dpi stuff and loose functionality. Perhaps that should be noted too.
Good catch! We don't want BLFS telling users to run Dillo in ways we don't support. Personally I don't understand the author's fear of installing alpha software. Does Dillo's "make install" do anything other than install a few executables and config files? If not then what's the problem with installing it? Also, the instructions should specify " ./configure --prefix=/usr " as the BLFS convention is to install everything in /usr rather than /usr/local . Jeremy Henty